Page Summary
zarfmouse.livejournal.com - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - oof.
Active Entries
- 1: Posted using TxtLJ
- 2: (no subject)
- 3: (no subject)
- 4: Posted using TxtLJ
- 5: Posted using TxtLJ
- 6: Posted using TxtLJ
- 7: (no subject)
- 8: (no subject)
- 9: (no subject)
- 10: (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2003-12-14 01:08 pm (UTC)Now if capturing Saddam means an end to hostilities in Iraq and capturing Osama means an end to the domestic security lock-down (roll back of the PATRIOT act) and an end to hostilities in Afghanistan..then maybe it'd be a lock. But as long as our troops are dying and we're constantly reminded of the "dangers" of unknown imminent terrorist attack by our lack of daily freedoms, I don't think people are going to attach too much value to the capture of Saddam and perhaps someday of Osama.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-14 02:27 pm (UTC)Say what?
Date: 2003-12-15 05:34 am (UTC)In many, MANY areas, people care WAY more about the brief news soundbites and the sense that something major has been accomplished (bear in mind, I'm saying the SENSE that something major blah blah blah) than the economy; when the economy is struggling, big cities are affected more consistently than rural areas. The rural areas are hit only when a specific plant shuts down.
I'm grossly oversimplifying, but my own grasp of economics is only slightly better than the average American's, which is really my point.
Take your average American (and please, do NOT overestimate the intelligence of the average American) and compare their understanding of the administration's role in shaping the country's economic situation with their understanding of "We got him."
The average American doesn't know that the President refused to sign a bill that would eliminate importing steel and help save Pittsburgh's economy because if he had signed it, several European countries were going to put stiff tariffs on imported orange juice, thus hurting the economy of Florida, a state with more electoral votes... but they get the idea of "Saddam's a bad guy. Bush said to stop him, and we stopped him."
I hope and pray that people like Dean are able to explain in everyday terms to the public that just because Bush "assigned" the mission to capture Saddam and we accomplished it doesn't mean that we were right to be there in the first place or that he actually had anything to do with it. If Gore had been elected, and if he had also sent in troops to accomplish the mission, it would be just as accomplished. This is an honor for our military, not our administration.
A final note: our local news last night interviewed the man on the street to get their reactions. Now, I have seen some stupid responses in local news pretty much everywhere I've been, but usually we get at least one or two "sensible" opinions.
The question was, "What do you think should be done with Saddam Hussein now that he is in U.S. custody?"
Answers ranged from "Put a gun to his head and say 'the heck with it'..." to "I say take him to the White House and let him and President Bush duke it out."
These people were serious, and I'm betting they're registered voters.
Frankly, the majority of Americans scare me.
--Strange/David
oof.
Date: 2003-12-15 08:28 am (UTC)-Jen Hendricks